TAG | United States
6
Why This Market Truism Just Isn’t True
0 Comments | Posted by Alexander Green in Alexander Green
Why This Market Truism Just Isn’t True
by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, December 5, 2011: Issue #1657
In my first book, The Gone Fishin’ Portfolio, I made a confession that startled some readers…
I retired from the investment services industry while I was still in my early 40s, but many of my clients had not become financially independent. This was not because I advised them poorly. I dealt with my clients honestly and gave them the best advice and service I could.
Yet, in many ways, they operated at a disadvantage. Some had a poor understanding of investment fundamentals. Others found it impossible to commit to a long-term investment plan. Many were simply too emotional about the markets, running to cash at the first hint of danger.
Contrarian instincts are rare, too, I learned. Few people are emotionally stirred by low stock prices. But every time there was a correction, a crash, or financial panic, my Scottish blood would surge, my pulse would rise, I’d rub my hands together, and start buying.
My clients, on the other hand, often did just the opposite, sometimes because they were too nervous but often because they bought into the old chestnut that a good investor doesn’t buy into a market downturn.
“The trend is your friend,” they’d say. Or “Don’t try to catch a falling knife.” This is surely the conventional wisdom in some quarters, but it’s not particularly wise. Here’s why …
For the last several months, traders have obsessed over problems in the Eurozone and the strength (or perceived weakness) of the U.S. economy. Taking a decidedly downbeat view, the market had a pretty horrendous November. But sentiment can turn on a dime and stocks can put on a furious – and completely unexpected – rally.
If you don’t already own stocks, it’s tough to catch the train after it has left the station.
Yet many gurus, including growth-stock advocate William O’Neill and his widely read publication Investor’s Business Daily, often insist that you shouldn’t but a stock unless the market itself is in a confirmed uptrend.
That may make sense in theory, but it often fails in practice. For instance, on page one each day, that paper reports whether the market is in a confirmed uptrend or downtrend. (And sometimes hedges, using language such as “Uptrend Under Pressure.”)
As we all know, this has been a volatile year for the market with the major indices bouncing up and down repeatedly. But you could hardly have chosen a worse strategy than to wait until the market was in a confirmed uptrend before buying. All that meant was that you bought into every short-term spike and then hit your trailing stops over and over again. (It must feel like banging your head against the wall.)
The Oxford Club has hit a number of its stops this year, too, sometimes protecting profits, other times protecting principal. But by buying great companies when the market was under pressure, we ended up with a lot of attractive entry points and plenty of both realized and unrealized profits.
True, if stocks go into a secular bear market, you can end with losses no matter how well you timed your entry points. However, you can never know whether a market drop is merely a correction or something more ominous until you are looking in the rear-view mirror.
You have to stick your neck out occasionally, pick your spots and buy stocks. If you don’t, what are you going to do? Buy bonds yielding 2.5 percent? Hold a money market paying less than one-tenth of one percent? It’s tough to beat inflation or meet your financial goals that way.
Let me make one thing clear, however. It’s most definitely a mistake to buy a troubled company that’s in a downtrend, no matter which way the broad market is heading. (That only works for those with exceptionally long time horizons – and often not even then.) But buying great companies when the broad market is a downtrend gives you a chance to obtain good prices on fine long-term investments and take advantage of tradable short-term rallies, too.
The next two months are traditionally one of the strongest periods for the stock market. No one can say, of course, whether that tradition will hold. But it’s a reasonable strategy to buy great companies when the market is down.
If your goal is to sell high, you have to start by buying low. And market corrections – like the one we’ve seen lately – give you an excellent opportunity to do just that.
Good investing,
Alexander Green
15
The One Place to Invest for Growth, Income… and Safety
0 Comments | Posted by Alexander Green in Alexander Green
The One Place to Invest for Growth, Income… and Safety
by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, November 14, 2011: Issue #1642
Eight weeks ago, I wrote an Investment U column pounding the table for dividend stocks. Since then, they’ve ratcheted higher, but I still see plenty of upside ahead.
Someone who shares my enthusiasm for high-yield stocks right now is my friend and former colleague Rick Pfeifer, Senior Portfolio Manager at Fund Advisors of America, a Florida-based money management firm.
On a recent trip to the sunshine state, I stopped into his office to hear why he, too, feels this is one of the best places to put your money to work today.
Q: Rick, there’s an awful lot of fear and anxiety about the economy and the stock market right now. Investors are confused and uncertain about what to do with their money. What is your take on things?
A: In a market as volatile as this, you have to spread your bets. But my take is this: If you’re looking for growth, buy dividend-paying stocks.
If you’re looking for income, buy dividend-paying stocks. If you’re looking for safety, buy dividend-paying stocks.
Q: Why?
A: The first question every investor has to ask himself is, “How should I divide my money among stocks, bonds and cash?”
The average money market fund currently pays two one-hundredths of one percent. At that rate, you will double your money in just 3,600 years.
Q: Not terribly attractive.
A: Definitely not.
And Treasury yields won’t make you jump up and click your heels, either. The 10-year guy is yielding two percent, which translates – at best – to a zero-percent yield after inflation.
Q: Tough to meet your investment goals that way.
A: Right.
In my view, dividend stocks are a good place to be right now for several reasons. Let’s talk about safety first. When the Dow traded at these levels 11 ½ years ago, it sold for 47 times earnings. Today it trades at less than 14 times earnings. Stocks are cheap right now on the basis of sales and earnings.
But even during market declines, dividend-paying stocks hold up better than non-dividend-paying stocks and sometimes fight the broad trend and rise in value. The reason is obvious. These tend to be mature, profitable companies with stable outlooks, plenty of cash and long-term staying power.
Q: U.S. companies are sitting on a record amount of cash now, too, right?
A: Correct.
U.S. companies currently hold more than $2 trillion in cash, a record. Thanks to this economy and the current Administration (don’t get me started), companies aren’t hiring and they’re not boosting spending. So a lot of this cash is rightfully going back to shareholders.
The Dow currently yields more than bonds. And dividend growth among U.S. companies has averaged 10 percent per year over the last two years, more than double the long-term dividend growth rate.
Q: Okay. Dividend stocks are less risky than non-dividend payers and currently pay more than cash or bonds. But how do you think this group will perform in the years ahead?
A: We can only use long-term historical performance as a guide, but the numbers are pretty darn encouraging. Over the last 50 years, for instance, the highest 20 percent yielding stocks in the S&P 500 returned 14.2 percent annually.
That’s good enough to double your money every five years – or quadruple it in 10. And if you were even more selective, say investing only in the 10 highest yielding stocks of the 100 largest companies in the S&P 500, your annual return would have been even better, 15.7 percent.
Q: We should add the standard caveat here about past performance and point out that there are risks with dividend stocks, too, right?
A: Indeed. You have to be selective. An investor would be foolish to plunk for a stock just because the dividend is large. The market is full of “dividend traps,” troubled companies that pay hefty dividends to keep investors from bailing out.
Q: How does an investor avoid those?
A: Mainly, by doing his or her homework. You need to look at prospective sales and earnings growth. You have to examine the balance sheet and make sure that the company isn’t too highly leveraged.
You have to note cash balances. And, perhaps most importantly, you need to analyze whether the payout ratio is sustainable.
Q: So can you give us a few examples of high-yielders that have you been buying in your managed accounts lately?
A: I’ve been nibbling at Windstream Corp. (Nasdaq: WIN), a well-run communications and networking company with an 8.3-percent current yield. I like oil and gas producer Enerplus (NYSE: ERF), with its high operating margins and 7.7-percent dividend.
And – this one is a bit different – I’ve been picking up a 10.3-percent yield with the Gabelli Global Gold Trust (AMEX: GGN). There are plenty of other attractive high-yield situations out there, too. They should be owned, of course, as part of a more broadly diversified portfolio.
Q: I agree, Rick. Thanks for your time. Let’s chat about this sector again in a few weeks.
Good investing,
Alexander Green
[Editor's Note: Fund Advisors offers Investment U subscribers a complimentary portfolio review. For more information, feel free to call Rick - or his partner Greg Galloway - at 800.438.3040 or 407.667.4729.]
by Alexander Green, Investment U’s Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, April 25, 2011: Issue #1498
“Buy Japan now?” a friend asked recently. “Are you nuts?”
His sentiment is understandable. Aside from the unfathomable human suffering in Japan over the past several weeks, there have been enormous economic setbacks as well.
Sendai, the biggest port in northeast Japan and a major exporter of auto parts, machinery and marine products, was virtually wiped off the map. Half a dozen oil refineries in the same area, representing a third of the nation’s entire refining capacity, are shut down. Roads, bridges, railways and other major infrastructure have been destroyed. And the Japanese economy – already limping along for most of the past two decades – is also beset with the world’s highest public debt relative to GDP (225%) and a rapidly aging population.
Why would anyone want to invest here?
In my experience, those words accompany virtually every great buying situation. But it takes more than just a lack of interest to create a true contrarian opportunity. Both sentiment and valuations have to be at an extreme.
And that’s certainly the case here…
Japanese Stock Prices Are Less Than Book Value
The average Japanese stock is selling for less than 14 times its annual profit. That’s cheap, and Japanese accounting methods also tend to understate earnings. An even better indicator is found in book values (assets minus liabilities). Stocks around the world (including the United States, Europe and China) currently sell for approximately two times book value. In Japan, they sell for less than book value. By this measure, U.S. stocks are twice as expensive as Japanese stocks.
What will turn Japan’s market around? For starters, the enormous rebuilding that will be required over the next few years. Devastated areas account for seven percent of Japan’s economy and a substantial portion of its land mass. A lot of businesses will receive substantial contracts as a result of the catastrophe.
History shows that Japan is adept at rebounding from catastrophe. (Take World War II or the 1995 Kobe earthquake as examples.) And when Tokyo enters a bull market, it can look like the Silver Spurs Rodeo. For example, if you invested $10,000 in the S&P 500 in 1970, two decades later it would have been worth more than $76,000. Not bad.
But the same amount invested in the Nikkei 225 would have turned into more than $600,000.
How to Buy into Japan’s Advanced Economic Power
Although China’s economy has now eclipsed Japan’s in size, Japan is still Asia’s most advanced economic power, with world-leading technologies and an unmatched infrastructure.
The cost of doing business in Japan has decreased dramatically in recent years, as well. Land prices, office rents and labor costs have come way down. So have taxes and tariffs. And the government has instituted serious banking reforms.
The nation also sits on a mountain of personal financial assets – more than $100,000 for every man, woman and child. After a decade of negative stock market returns, most of this capital is sitting in low-yielding bank deposits. Even a small fraction of these assets returning to the equity market could give it a serious jolt.
So how do you play a rebound? Consider a Japan ETF or some of the country’s unloved blue chips like Toyota (NYSE: TM), Mitsubishi Financial (NYSE: MTU), Canon (NYSE: CAJ), or NTT DOCOMO (NYSE: DCM).
The healing there will take time, of course. But just as the U.S. stock market rebounded from the recent financial crisis quicker than almost anyone expected, things in Japan may look dramatically different in six to 12 months from now.
Of course, very few people believe that. But, in one sense, that’s a good thing. Negative sentiment and low valuations are the defining characteristics of contrarian investing.
Bottom fishermen, cast your nets.
Good investing,
Alexander Green
9
The End-of-the-World Portfolio… Is it Too Early to Have One?
0 Comments | Posted by Alexander Green in Alexander Green
The End-of-the-World Portfolio… Is it Too Early to Have One?
by Alexander Green, Chief Investment Strategist
Wednesday, June 9, 2010: Issue #1277
First one friend called. Then another. And then yet another.
Now their friends are calling me, too, asking about my “End-of-the-World Portfolio.”
So I’ve decided to just go ahead and tell everyone about it.
All the friends who called – and their friends, too – are well-educated businessmen. They’re convinced that not only the United States government, but also the governments of Europe, Britain and Japan have simply lost their tether.
We’ve all seen deficit spending before. It’s been a problem for decades. But nothing like this…
Putting the Eye-Popping Numbers into Perspective
The unfunded liabilities for Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid alone now top $108 trillion.
Of course, that number is too large to mean anything to most of us. It’s only when you bring it into context that it becomes alarming.
The $108 trillion is approximately $815,000 per U.S. taxpayer. (And this is just the projected shortfall in Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. It has nothing to do with the rest of the federal debt, which tops $13 trillion.)
Entitlement spending in other parts of the world is an even bigger problem. And the federal deficits are even more gargantuan. In Japan, for example, debt as a percentage of GDP will hit 200% this year.
Many of my friends look at the fiscal problems in Greece – that necessitated a $1 trillion bailout from the European Union – as just a warning shot across the bow. They’re concerned that things are only just beginning to unravel and will get considerably worse.
Are they right? Only time will tell. But here’s what they keep telling me…
Are You At the Mercy of Wasteful Governments?
“Alex, I busted my hump to earn this money. I’ve paid taxes on it. I’ve saved it instead of spending it. I’m not going down with the ship if those boneheads in Washington spend us into oblivion. How do I protect myself?”
Let me begin by saying that I’ve listened to apocalyptic economic forecasts for decades now. Putting all your money in gold bullion, freeze-dried food and shotgun shells hasn’t been a particularly auspicious strategy.
The difference here is that these folks aren’t gloom-and-doomers who have droned the same message for over 30 years. They are ordinarily optimistic folks who think Western governments are driving the world economy down the road to ruin.
The knock against democracy in Greece and Rome a few thousand years ago was that once the electorate realized they could use their representatives to loot the Treasury, all would be lost. Lately, that remark is looking prescient.
As one friend summed it up: “Look, Alex, I don’t care if I’m wrong about Armageddon and my returns turn out to be lower than what they might have been. Just tell me what to do so I can hang on to what I’ve got and maybe match or beat inflation by a little bit.”
How to Allocate Your Assets in the “End-of-the-World Portfolio”
With that modest goal in mind, here is my suggestion if you want to hunker down for the end of the world – a posture that admittedly may be premature.
- Put 40% of your liquid portfolio in a laddered portfolio of AAA-insured, tax-free bonds. (Be sure to buy state-specific bonds if you’re in a high-tax state.)
- Put 40% in a laddered portfolio of inflation-adjusted Treasuries, also AAA-rated. (For tax reasons, these are best owned in your retirement account.) This is your protection against inflation, as Uncle Sam might opt to spend us out of a tight spot with interest rates already near zero.
- Put the remaining 20% in defensive, blue-chip, dividend-paying stocks. I’m referring to food companies, healthcare companies, utilities, defense contractors, gold mining companies and the like. This should provide some growth and income.
Why include stocks at all? Because 200 years of history shows that an 80/20 split between stocks and bonds is actually less risky than a 100% bond portfolio.
On a personal note, I would not invest my own money this way. (At least not yet.) I’m not calling for the end of the world.
But my friends seem grateful just to have a clear-cut plan. One of them even concedes that it’s not his “End-of-the-World Portfolio”: “I tell people it’s my “Cup-Your-Groin Portfolio.”
I suppose it is. I only hope our elected misrepresentatives get the message before we all need one.
Good investing,
Alexander Green
Laddering means varying your portfolio between short-, medium- and long-term bonds. This is your protection against deflation and the virtual certainty of higher taxes. |
