TAG | Financial services
17
Is Your Investment Advisor Capitalizing on Your Fear?
0 Comments | Posted by Alexander Green in Alexander Green
Is Your Investment Advisor Capitalizing on Your Fear?
by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, January 16, 2012: Issue #1687
Make no mistake. Investors are petrified right now. And they’re telling their investment advisors about it.
The question is: “What is he or she doing in response?” If the answer is adjusting your asset allocation, focusing on your long-term investment goals, or doing a bit of handholding, you probably have a good one.
But if they’re preying on your emotional state with unsuitable investments or all-or-nothing advice, beware.
The story is as old as equity investing itself. When times are good, investors get complacent, take too much risk and generally regret it. When times are bad, investors become anxiety-ridden, take too little risk and generally regret it. Seasoned advisors know this and try to keep you on the right track. But less knowledgeable or less scrupulous advisors may try to take advantage of your worries.
For instance, your investment advisor may recommend that you load up on variable annuities in this uncertain environment. Not a good idea. Some annuities are right for some people. They offer tax-deferred compounding (like an IRA) and a principal guarantee. But the typical annuity is ridiculously expensive, offers mediocre insurance coverage, restricts your investment choices to so-so mutual funds, lacks liquidity and comes with enormous surrender penalties.
Too many investors learn these things about annuities after they’ve plunked for one. Hence, you’ll often hear investors complain that they are “stuck in an annuity” for several years. Investigate these insurance contracts before you invest. On the whole they are oversold, frequently misrepresented and completely inappropriate for many folks.
Another sign that you have a misguided (or unethical) investment advisor is if he suggests that you abandon proven investment principles. For example, if your investment plan is based on a broker’s economic forecast or market timing advice, good luck. You’re going to need it.
No one can accurately predict the economy with any consistency. And it wouldn’t really matter if they could. Stocks routinely rally during the bad times and sell-off during the good ones. If your investment advisor doesn’t know this, you shouldn’t be using her. If she does and is still trying to convince you to flee the market, that’s even worse.
Also beware investment advisors who are paid on a transaction basis and therefore have an incentive for you to trade more frequently. Some brokers today are telling their clients that the old rules no longer apply, that you need to jump in and out of the market and from stock to stock. For a commission-based broker, this can be entirely self-serving advice. And it is almost certain to end badly… at least for the client.
I know it’s tough to buy – or just hang in there – when the outlook is dark. But look back at history. The market was a screaming “Buy” after the crash of ’87, the bear market of 1990, the tech wreck of 1994, the Asian Contagion of 1997, the 2000 to 2002 bear market, and even during the depths of the financial crisis in 2008.
If you’re using an advisor who insists that “this time it’s different,” you might reasonably examine his experience, his ethics and his disciplinary history. And seek out more-qualified advice.
Good Investing,
Alexander Green
Why the Gold Slump is Not Over
by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, January 09, 2012: Issue #1682
Not long ago, my colleague Mark Skousen asked a roomful of attendees at an investment conference how many of them owned gold. Virtually every hand in the room went up.
“And how many of you have ever sold any of your gold?”
Virtually every hand in the room came down.
For many investors, gold is their “forever investment,” the one asset they never plan to sell. That could be a mistake, a big one.
I can assure you that the institutional investors who have bid gold up the last few years consider the metal a “hot date,” not a long-term marriage. And that bodes ill for prices in the short to medium term.
Yes, I was bearish on gold a year ago. But I’m more bearish on it today. After all, the trend is your friend.
True, gold went up in the first half of 2011 and didn’t peak until August. But take a look at a five-month chart.
It’s not a pretty picture.
Of course, gold is hard to value under the best of circumstances. It has very few industrial uses. It generates no earnings, pays no dividends, accrues no interest and provides no rental income. That means the best any of us can do is guess where it’s headed next.
So why am I guessing it will be lower? Let me count the ways:
1. Gold is a wonderful inflation hedge. But the metal is up more than five-fold over the last 12 years and inflation is still not a problem. Is it not conceivable that inflation could tick up and gold – having already discounted this – moves lower?
2. Gold is a great performer in an economic crisis. But we already had the crisis. It ended in 2008. Things are getting slowly better, not worse.
3. With gold prices still in the stratosphere and the value of the rupee falling, India – the world’s biggest consumer of gold – is likely to experience a pronounced drop-off in demand this year. Not good.
4. Gold is now well above the marginal cost of production. New mines are opening and old mines are re-opening. It’s Economics 101. Greater supply depresses prices.
5. If you believe the gargantuan debt load that Washington has run up will cause gold to rally from here, you may want to think again. Japan’s debt load as a percentage of GDP is more than twice ours and the end result has been disinflation, not inflation. Why will it be different this time? Indeed, George Soros and several other major speculators are openly forecasting outright deflation. That would not be good for gold.
6. Note that while gold ended the year up in 2011, gold shares dropped 16%. Already, equity investors are taking a dim view of the sustainability of gold’s advance. I think they’re right.
7. Investment demand for gold has soared in recent years. Seven years ago, it made up just 16% of total demand. Today it’s more than 40%. But hedge fund managers who piled into gold, unlike Mom and Pop, have no emotional commitment to the metal. These are hair-trigger traders. When the primary trend turns unequivocally south, you can bet these guys will dump gold faster than a freshman girlfriend.
I’m not suggesting that anyone bail out of gold. You should hold at least 5% of your liquid assets in gold and gold stocks, and perhaps more. But if you’re one of those folks I meet who has 30%, 50% … even 80% in the barbarous relic, you’re really sitting at the roulette table at 3 AM.
No one can say unequivocally that the bet won’t pay off. But there could be a steep price to pay if it doesn’t. The last time gold was a bubble, investors were down more than 60% two decades later.
As Mark Twain said, “History may not repeat itself. But it rhymes.”
Good Investing,
Alexander Green
by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, January 02, 2012: Issue #1677
Investors are scared right now and it’s not hard to see why.
Economic growth is anemic. Unemployment is high. Banks are saddled with toxic assets. Problems in the Eurozone continue to fester. Residential real estate is sinking in a mire of short sales and foreclosures. And both federal and state governments – not to mention consumers themselves – are drowning in a sea of red ink.
We have all heard these negatives repeated daily and cycled endlessly in the national media.
However, these reports often leave out or play down the good news: Inflation is low. Short-term rates are near zero. Energy and food prices are declining. Emerging market economies – which are end markets for the developed world – are still booming. Corporate profits are at an all-time record – and have been for seven quarters now. And stock valuations are low. (The S&P 500 has historically traded at an average of 16 times earnings. Today it’s less than 14 times earnings.)
Last year I shared another key insight with you. It has always been a positive indicator for stocks when the Dow yields more than Treasury bonds.
This makes sense when you think about it. Shares are riskier than bonds. Investors should demand a higher yield. Yet almost never since 1958 have stocks yielded more than Treasuries. Today they do, however. The 10-year bond yields just two percent. The Dow yields 30 percent more.
If you’re still not convinced that equities are a good place to be in 2012, let me draw your attention to one of the strongest indicators of all…
Contrarian Investing Works
It’s a truism that no one consistently predicts the stock market. (That’s why money manager and Forbes 400 member Ken Fisher calls it “The Great Humiliator.”) However, there’s a straightforward system that offers a reasonable prospect of timing the market reasonably well in the future.
A 25-year study published last year in The Journal of Financial Economics found that if you had simply invested in the S&P 500 when equity fund flows were negative (redemptions exceeded new investments) and into 90-day Treasury bills when fund flows were positive (new investments exceeded redemptions) you would have substantially outperformed the market while spending nearly half the time in riskless T-bills.
In other words, contrarian investing works. This system would have you do the very inverse of what the great mass of investors is doing. (It turns out they have god-awful instincts, so it pays to buck the consensus.)
Bear in mind, if you’d followed this system, you wouldn’t just have earned higher returns than being fully invested. You would have done it with far less risk, spending nearly half the time in riskless T-bills.
I mention this because the Investment Company Institute recently reported that investors are yanking billions out of equity funds virtually every week and pouring the money into ultra-low-paying money market accounts. The Wall Street Journal further reports that “investors have continued to consistently pull money from U.S. equity funds since August.”
I’m trying to contain my glee. Who says no one rings a bell in the stock market?
The fear and pessimism about both the economy and the stock market are way overdone and fully discounted in current stock prices. If you can’t be stirred by low interest rates, low inflation, low valuations and record profits, you really should ask yourself two important questions:
1. Is logic or emotion governing my decision making about my portfolio?
2. If I don’t invest in stocks – the greatest wealth creator of all time – how am I going to meet my long-term financial goals?
We’ll talk more about these issues in the weeks ahead. But, for the record, I think 2012 will be a good year for the stock market and – although virtually no one expects or believes it – perhaps even a barnburner.
Good Investing,
Alexander Green
8
How to Insure Your Financial Freedom
0 Comments | Posted by Alexander Green in Alexander Green
How to Insure Your Financial Freedom
by Alexander Green, Chief Investment Strategist
Friday, October 8, 2010: Issue #1362
If there’s one word that encapsulates the world’s current investment environment, it’s this: uncertainty. For example…
- A raft of economists and market analysts look at the sharp climb in Treasury bonds and claim that we’re in for a period of deflation, perhaps like Japan experienced in the 1990s… or worse.
- Other economists point to the historic rally in gold that has pushed the price through the $1,300 per ounce mark and forecast higher inflation.
- Over the first half of the year, the Eurozone looked like it was coming apart at the seams and the euro got slammed. But in the third quarter, the currency staged an impressive rally, climbing 11.5% against the U.S. dollar.
- Will the dollar rise or fall from here? It’s hard to say. We’re in the midst of an international currency war. Governments and central banks around the globe are trying to force down their currencies in a beggar-thy-neighbor attempt to gain a competitive advantage over their trading partners.
Nobel Prize-winning economist Robert Mundell recently noted on Bloomberg TV that this “is a terrible thing for the world economy” and that, “We’ve never been in this unstable position in the entire currency history of 3,000 years.”
So what are investors doing to combat it?
The Ultimate 2-for-1 Investment: Upside Growth and Downside Protection
Is it any wonder that so many investors are hiding in cash, earning an average .05% return on their money? (Note that an investment compounding at this rate takes 1,440 years to double.)
But wouldn’t it be great if you could own an investment that allows you to participate in global growth if the world economy recovers and protects 100% of your portfolio if it doesn’t?
Such an investment already exists. In fact, Erika Nolan and Shannon Crouch just wrote a book about it. It’s called The Insured Portfolio: Your Gateway to Stress-Free Global Investments.
Protect Your Wealth and Assets from the Ravages of the Market
I’ve known Erika and Shannon – and respected their global expertise – for years. You may have met them yourself at one of our many conferences. They head up The Sovereign Society, an offshore asset protection and international finance organization. Their specialty is showing investors how to preserve wealth, protect assets from frivolous lawsuits, diversify outside the U.S. dollar and enjoy tax-privileged growth.
As a former Wall Street executive myself, I can assure you that the average broker, insurance agent or money manager knows nothing about this area. Erika and Shannon have decades of experience in the field and have teamed up with Marc-Andre Sola, a Swiss attorney, to provide the best and latest information on offshore asset protection and estate planning.
If you’re young, just starting out in the investment game and have yet to accumulate much, you can safely give this information a miss. But if you’ve accumulated a substantial nest egg and are concerned about potential losses from volatile markets, high inflation, a weak dollar or potential litigants, The Insured Portfolio offers battle-tested strategies you cannot afford to ignore.
You’ve Worked Hard for Your Money… And Here’s the Best Way to Make Sure You Keep It
Look at it this way: If you’re a high-net-worth individual, you’ve probably succeeded against intense competition in your field. (That’s not easy.) You’ve paid a high percentage of your income in taxes. And you’ve saved a substantial amount of your after-tax income instead of spending it.
Are you willing to let violent markets, misguided and self-interested politicians or rapacious lawyers take the fruits of years of hard work, persistence and prudent living?
If your answer – as I suspect – is a resounding “no,” check out The Insured Portfolio. It’s available at bookstores nationwide. Or you can pick it up today for less than $20 on Amazon.
Good investing,
Alexander Green
13
Are You Ready for The Evergreen Portfolio?
0 Comments | Posted by Alexander Green in Alexander Green
Are You Ready for The Evergreen Portfolio?
by Alexander Green, Investment U’s Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, September 13, 2010: Issue #1343
Bill Gross, the top-performing manager of the Pimco Total Return Fund, the world’s largest actively managed mutual fund, says it’s time for investors to accept and start adjusting to “the new normal.”
What’s that?
High unemployment, excess housing capacity, difficult-to-obtain credit and, not least of all, much-lower-than-historic returns from stocks, bonds, real estate and cash.
Sounds depressing. However, some investment advisors aren’t content telling their clients to simply lower their expectations. Two of them are seasoned investors Martin Truax and Ron Miller, Managing Directors at Atlanta-based Morgan Keegan & Company.
Adjusting to the “New Normal” With The Evergreen Portfolio
Truax and Miller point out that “buy and hold” investing and simple diversification haven’t worked over the last 10 years – and it’s hard to disagree. The S&P 500, for example, is no higher than it was in 1999.
Looking forward, they argue that these failed approaches won’t work over the next 10 years either.
Yet there are proven strategies that are likely to produce high returns with an acceptable level of risk. In their new book, The Evergreen Portfolio, out this week from John Wiley & Sons, Truax and Miller invite more than a dozen of the nation’s leading analysts to talk about “the new normal” and make specific recommendations about what investors should do with their money today. (They also reveal their own particular solution: The Evergreen Portfolio itself.)
The book is chock full of interesting and unconventional investment angles. That’s not too surprising when you consider who was involved in this project.
The Evergreen Portfolio: A “Who’s Who” of the Investment World
Contributors to The Evergreen Portfolio include such well-known names as…
- Rick Rule, CEO of Global Resource Investments.
- Dr. Mark Skousen, free-market economist, former Investment U Chairman and current contributing editor, and editor of Forecasts & Strategies.
- Elliott Gue, editor of The Energy Strategist.
- Frank Trotter, currency specialist and president of EverBank.
- Mining specialist Bob Bishop, the longtime editor of Gold Mining Stock Report.
- Bob Prechter, editor of The Elliott Wave Theorist.
- Richard Maybury, publisher of U.S. and World Early Warning Report.
There are many others, including yours truly. (In the interest of full disclosure, I have not received – and will not receive – any compensation from the sale of this book.)
There is a lot of pessimism out there right now about what lies ahead for the economy and stock market. Yet, unlike most investment advisors, Truax and Miller don’t try to convince the reader otherwise. They are convinced that excess consumer debt, weakness in housing, and rampant government spending are creating a very tough environment for investors.
Their advice – and the investment advice of their contributors – is to face up to this new reality and start managing your portfolio effectively to deal with it.
Why You Need to Read The Evergreen Portfolio
The Evergreen Portfolio is written for:
- Investors who want a thorough understanding of “the new normal” and hard-hitting advice about how to protect your assets even in inflationary or deflationary times.
- Businesspeople and other professionals who have been successful in their careers but need a solid foundation for investment success.
- Investors who are unhappy with the performance of their brokers and money managers and want “untainted” investment advice.
- Investors who are overwhelmed with too many investment choices and want an uncomplicated approach to the market.
I’m a contributor to The Evergreen Portfolio, so perhaps I have a positive bias. But the book is the distilled wisdom of more than 15 seasoned investment pros and a thoroughly enjoyable read, full of unconventional ideas and unusual insights.
There will be fortunes made and lost in the months ahead – and, like most readers, I intend to be on the winning side. The Evergreen Portfolio is a survival guide for those who want to protect and build their wealth in the tumultuous years that almost certainly lie ahead.
Good investing,
Alexander Green
P.S. The Evergreen Portfolio is available at bookstores nationwide and is currently discounted 28% on Amazon. For further information on the book, click here.
30
Jeremy Siegel: Treasury Bonds Today Are a Sucker Bet
0 Comments | Posted by Alexander Green in Alexander Green
Jeremy Siegel: Treasury Bonds Today Are a Sucker Bet
by Alexander Green, Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, August 30, 2010: Issue #1334
The investment advisory industry is full of gurus – and various charlatans – claiming that they made incredible stock market calls.
But Wharton Professor Dr. Jeremy Siegel made perhaps the greatest call of all time at the right moment and for the right reasons. Those who listened to him saved themselves many thousands of dollars – and untold agony.
Now Dr. Siegel is making another bold prediction. You can only ignore it at your peril. Here’s why…
Siegel Shocks the Market
On March 13, 2000, The Wall Street Journal ran an op-ed piece from Dr. Siegel entitled “Big-Cap Stocks Are a Sucker Bet.” The column shocked the investment community.
Here was the man, author of the investment classic Stocks for the Long Run and who provided the intellectual underpinnings of the greatest bull market in history, claiming that the greatest stock market darlings weren’t just overvalued. They were a “sucker bet.”
Siegel focused on the 33 largest firms based on market capitalization – those with values greater than $85 billion. Of these, 18 were technology stocks. He noted that their market-weighted P/E equaled 126. What’s more, he pointed out that half of the large-cap technology stocks had P/Es over 100. For these stocks, the market-weighted P/E was 208.
These prices were totally unjustifiable. There was no way that these companies could grow fast enough to support such insane valuations.
Are You Heeding Siegel’s Current Warning?
That month, the Nasdaq – home to these tech giants – hit its all-time high of 5,132. From there, it imploded. Many of the stocks he singled out in the column – like Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO) and JDS Uniphase (Nasdaq: JDSU) – plunged over 99%.
Even today – more than 10 years later – the Nasdaq is 60% below its high.
It’s great when a knowledgeable analyst like this rings a clear warning bell at the top. So understand that he’s doing it again today.
Earlier this month, he wrote another Wall Street Journal op-ed piece. This one is called “The Great American Bond Bubble.”
Siegel says: “What is happening today is the flip side of what happened in 2000. Just as investors were too enthusiastic then about the growth prospects in the economy, many investors today are far too pessimistic.”
As a result, they’re plowing money into Treasuries and Treasury mutual funds.
This will almost certainly end badly.
Unless we have a full-blown deflationary depression, these bonds are a horrible bet, offering minuscule yields and huge downside risk. Many investors don’t realize how badly they can get clobbered in super-safe Treasuries when the bond market turns down. (And those holding leveraged bond funds could see 40% or more of their principal vanish in a matter of months.)
As Siegel concludes: “Those who are now crowding into bonds and bond funds are courting disaster… The possibility of substantial capital losses looms large.”
What does Siegel propose that income investors hold instead?
Don’t Be a Sucker: Invest in This Asset Class Instead
Large-cap dividend stocks.
He points out that the 10 largest dividend payers in the United States are:
AT&T (NYSE: T)
Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM)
Chevron (NYSE: CVX)
Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG)
Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ)
Verizon (NYSE: VZ)
Phillip Morris (NYSE: PM)
Pfizer (NYSE: PFE)
General Electric (NYSE: GE)
Merck (NYSE: MRK)
And together…
- They sport an average dividend yield of 4%, substantially more than what 10-year Treasuries are paying.
- Their average P/E ratio is 11.7 versus 13 for the S&P 500.
- Aside from the mountain of cash they’re sitting on, their prospective earnings will cover their dividends by more than 2 to 1.
Despite fears of another stock market dip, income investors are wise to switch from Treasuries to high-dividend stocks. It might not feel like the right thing to do, but neither did buying stocks at the market low 17 months ago.
In short, I couldn’t agree with Dr. Siegel more. Treasury bonds today are a sucker bet.
Good investing,
Alexander Green
28
The Japanese Stock Market: How to Play “The Land of Rising Stocks”
0 Comments | Posted by Alexander Green in Alexander Green
The Japanese Stock Market: How to Play “The Land of Rising Stocks”
by Alexander Green, Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, June 28, 2010: Issue #1290
The Wall Street Journal reported last week that, for the first time in three years, foreign investors are increasing their holdings in the Japanese stock market.
Data released by the Tokyo Stock Exchange shows that foreign ownership of Japanese shares rose to 26% for the year that ended in March, up from 23.5% a year earlier.
The Journal suggests that a recovery in Japanese corporate earnings is tempting foreign investors back to the country’s equity markets.
But I think there’s more going on here. Perhaps hedge fund managers and other savvy global investors have paged back through their old, dog-eared copies of Dr. Jeremy Siegel’s Stocks for the Long Run.
If so, they may have recognized something significant…
Crunching the Numbers on Japan
Siegel notes that it’s rare for stocks to go 10 years without giving a positive return. Yet we’ve experienced just such a rarity over the last decade.
For stocks to go 20 years without giving a positive return is almost unheard of. And 30 years? That’s rarer than Big Foot, Nessie and the Abominable Snowman combined.
Which brings me back to Japan…
- In 1989, the Nikkei 225 – Japan’s equivalent of the S&P 500 – hit a new all-time high near 40,000. Today, more than 20 years later, it languishes near 10,000 – almost 75% lower.
- In other words, the Nikkei 225 would have to rise 300% just to get back where it was in 1989.
And it wouldn’t surprise me if it did just that by the end of the decade. After all, it’s happened before.
In the 1970s, the U.S. market returned just 0.34% a year – a 3.4% total return for the decade. Yet the Japanese market compounded at 16%, generating a 10-year return of 344%.
What other asset class offers that kind of potential return over the next decade? (Gold bugs, keep your seats.)
Don’t Chase the Bullet Train… Get on Board Now
The groundwork has been laid.
Last August, after more than 50 years, Japan’s opposition party trounced the Liberal Democratic Party in a landslide election.
The new government has promised to shrink the country’s massive bureaucracy and cut wasteful public spending. It also intends to end more than 20 years of economic stagnation by cutting taxes and focusing on small and mid-sized businesses.
Of course, we’re all skeptical of politicians’ promises, but there is evidence that they mean business this time. Twenty years is a long time to leave your economy in a funk.
It’s resulted in Japanese stocks being among the cheapest and most unloved in the world. Virtually no one is enthusiastic about the Tokyo market.
However, great opportunities are born when dirt-cheap valuations marry investor apathy. Plus, Japanese investors are flush with cash. They’ve largely ignored domestic stocks after two decades of sub-par returns. And as that money begins to find its way out of mattresses and back into Japanese equities, the Tokyo market should lift off.
This is doubly true when institutional money managers return to Japan in a serious way. For years, global fund managers have outperformed the world benchmark by simply underweighting Japan. But let the Shinkansen take off without them and they will be forced to dash after it.
So how do you play this?
Two Ways to Ride the Japanese Stock Market
There are dozens of worthwhile Japanese ADRs trading on Nasdaq and the Big Board.
But you can gain exposure to the Japanese stock market through two ETFs…
- iShares MSCI Japan Index (NYSE: EWJ), which invests in large-cap Japanese stocks.
- Wisdom Tree Japan Small-Cap Dividend Fund (NYSE: DFJ), which captures the best of the Japanese small-cap sector.
Or you can spread your bets and own both.
Incidentally, if you remain skeptical about Japanese stocks digging their way out of this 21-year hole, consider again how unlikely it is that Japanese stocks will earn a negative 30-year return.
As Dr. Siegel writes in Stocks For the Long Run:
“In the 12 years from 1948 to 1960, German stocks rose by over 30% per year in real terms. Indeed, from 1939, when the Germans began the war in Poland, through 1960, the real return on German stocks matched those in the United States and exceeded those in the U.K. Despite the total devastation that the war visited on Germany, the long-run investor made out as well in defeated Germany as in victorious Britain or the United States. The data powerfully attest to the resilience of stocks in the face of seemingly destructive political, social, and economic change.”
The story in Japan was similar. By the end of 1945, stock prices stood at about approximately one-third of their level just prior to the Empire’s surrender. Over the next 40 years, the Japanese market returned more than 20 times its American counterpart.
If 200 years of world stock market history is any guide, the current decade should be another barnburner for Japan.
Good investing,
Alexander Green
Do Trailing Stops Really Work?
by Alexander Green, Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, June 14, 2010: Issue #1280
While I was in Baltimore last week, one of our Oxford Club researchers, Matt Carr, told me over lunch that one of the most controversial aspects of our investment policy is trailing stops.
But they shouldn’t be.
If you don’t have a premeditated sell discipline – and the vast majority of investors don’t – you’re flying by the seat of your pants. And that rarely leads to superior investment performance.
But do trailing stops really work?
Survey Says: Use Trailing Stops
In a word: Yes. Trailing stops protect your profits and your trading capital. And there’s much more than just anecdotal evidence.
In a study published in The Journal of Portfolio Management, Christophe Faugere, Hany A. Shawky and David M. Smith – finance professors at the State University of New York at Albany – researched the performance of money managers who oversee pension funds, endowments and high-net-worth accounts.
Because most institutions work under strict investment guidelines, these academics were able to analyze performance based on differing approaches to selling stocks.
The result? Institutional managers who fared best were those with restrictive rules that didn’t allow much leeway for holding stocks for emotional reasons. Managers who relied on “flexible” sell strategies did far worse.
Count me as unsurprised. Institutional money managers are just as prone to rationalizing as individual investors when they make a mistake. (Hence the old Wall Street chestnut, “What does a broker call a trade gone wrong? A long-term investment.”)
Trailing Stops: Providing Protection… Securing Profits
The culprit is almost always pride, ego, or emotion. Without any kind of sell strategy, emotions come into play. And emotions are almost always wrong.
But by adhering to a disciplined trailing stop strategy, our Oxford Club investment system mows down emotion-driven trading errors like a field full of dandelions.
It cures greed. Eliminates fear. And does away with wishful thinking – as in, “I hope this stock turns around and starts going the right way.”
Of course, trailing stops aren’t the only sell discipline out there. But they’re one of the easiest to implement. They serve two purposes…
- They make sure we never let a small loss become an unacceptable loss.
- They keep us from selling stocks while they’re still trending up.
According to the independent Hulbert Financial Digest, over the past 10 years our Oxford Club portfolios have beaten the S&P 500 by a wide margin. Part of our success has come from diligent research and careful stock selection. But part has also come from cutting our losses and letting our profits run.
Maneuver Past the Market Makers With TradeStops.com
The one knock against using trailing stops is that unscrupulous market makers will sometimes take out your stop order right before a stock takes off.
But Richard Smith, President and Founder of TradeStops.com – and a PhD in mathematics – has a service that provides an ingenious solution.
If you visit www.tradestops.com, you can enter the stocks you own, the price you paid and the percentage trailing stop you want to use. There are several valuable benefits…
- If any of your stocks close beneath your selected stop, TradeStops sends a message – to your cell phone, e-mail, or account page – alerting you.
- Some brokerage firms, like Fidelity, offer trailing stop alerts with their accounts. But they generally expire after 30 or 60 days. TradeStops information never expires and even offers a 30-day risk-free trial.
- You can track up to 50 stocks at a time. (And whenever you stop out of one, you can replace it with another.)
- TradeStops is easy to use. It’s specifically designed for technophobes.
- It’s reasonably priced. Ordinarily, the cost is $7.95 a month or $79.50 a year. (If you’re an Oxford Club member, you get a special rate of $39.95 a year.) There are additional services available for dedicated short-term traders who want even more.
- It’s important to note that TradeStops notifies you of stops, not your broker. And it doesn’t enter sell orders. But the key is to make sure you have an acknowledged point where you’d be willing to sell any individual stock.
Trailing stops don’t just offer to cut your losses and protect your profits. They guarantee it.
Good investing,
Alexander Green
Editor’s Note: Much of what it takes to become a successful investor comes down to knowing the best times to buy and sell. Some investors rely on technical analysis; others pinpoint fundamentals. But regardless, trailing stops are essential to protect yourself from a volatile, unforgiving market.
Adhering to a disciplined trailing stop policy is just one of the core wealth-building strategies that has made The Oxford Club one of the most of the most successful investment publishers. In fact, over the past decade, the independent Hulbert Financial Digest has ranked The Oxford Club’s Communiqué as one of the top five investment newsletters.
So if you want to take all the guesswork out of the buying/selling process and let the Oxford Club analysts do the work for you, then consider becoming a member. For $79, you’ll receive an entire year’s worth of stock recommendations, with instructions on when to buy and when to sell for maximum profits. (You’ll also be eligible for the special TradeStops rate mentioned above, too). Take a look at the full list of Oxford Club membership benefits.
26
Timing the Market: If Only You Knew What Mark Hulbert Knows…
0 Comments | Posted by Alexander Green in Alexander Green
Timing the Market: If Only You Knew What Mark Hulbert Knows…
by Alexander Green, Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, April 26, 2010: Issue #1246
For over a decade, I’ve been telling readers that timing the market isn’t just unhelpful… it actually hurts performance.
Now the evidence is even more definitive…
Sure, it’s easy to look back and see exactly when you could have been in or out of the market for maximum performance. That’s the beauty of hindsight.
But when you look ahead, things get a whole lot cloudier. So if you’re even thinking about jumping in or out based on some guru’s system or “market outlook,” listen up…
Trying to Time the Market? Don’t Do It!
The Journal of Financial Economics, an academic journal, recently published a new study – “Measuring Investor Sentiment With Mutual Fund Flows.”
Using easily available public information published by the Investment Company Institute, a mutual fund trade organization, the researchers focused on investor exchanges out of stock funds into bond funds and vice-versa.
This led to an interesting discovery…
- The research shows that market timers, as a group, have god-awful instincts. In fact, you could hardly find a better investment system than to do EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE of what they’re doing.
- The researchers built a hypothetical portfolio going all the way back to 1984 and switched back-and-forth between the S&P 500 and 90-day T-bills. They did the mirror opposite of what mutual fund flow figures showed switchers were doing.
- Over the next 25 years, the portfolio produced an annual return of 12% – 1.6% a year better than merely buying and holding the S&P 500.
To put this in concrete terms, buy-and-holders turned a $10,000 initial investment (with dividends reinvested) into $118,639 over the period.
Those who did the opposite of mutual fund timers, however, turned the same $10,000 into more than $170,000. (Most fund switchers, on the other hand, did about as well as someone betting on black or red at the roulette wheel.)
That’s not the best part, however…
An Impressive Performance… For Serious Contrarians Only
What makes these numbers even more impressive is that the contrarian portfolio took on far less risk than being fully invested in stocks. After all, it was invested in riskless T-bills nearly half the time.
I’m not actually recommending that you follow this strategy, incidentally. For one thing, past performance – as every investment prospectus reminds you – does not guarantee future results.
Plus, 25 years as a portfolio manager and investment writer have proved to me that the overwhelming majority of investors lack the emotional discipline to invest contrary to the crowd. (So when the chips are down, you may still be out.)
As Mark Hulbert, editor of the independent Hulbert Financial Digest, concludes, the average investor “would be far better off if he never engaged in market timing.”
The Oxford Club doesn’t. And it shows in our results…
A Top Five Ranking for 10 Years Running
Of course, every newsletter editor brags that his investment letter gives superior returns. The industry bears an uncanny resemblance to Lake Wobegone, where “all the women are strong, all the men are good-looking and all the children are above average.”
It’s worth noting, however, that Hulbert ranks The Oxford Club Communiqué among the top five letters in the nation for risk-adjusted performance over the past 10 years.
That allows us to give entirely honest answers to the two most commonly asked questions:
- “How has your investment advice worked out?” – Beautifully.
- “What do you think the market will do next?” – We haven’t the foggiest notion.
Good investing,
Alexander Green
Editor’s Note: Are you trying to time the stock market? Don’t! There’s a better way to tackle the investing process: let some of the best, most successful analysts in the business do the work for you.
The Oxford Club’s pragmatic, “market neutral” approach has generated consistent, impressive results for many years, based on real facts, information and numbers that matter, not arbitrary stock market indicators or timing.
For more details on how you can profit from the stocks in The Oxford Club’s Communiqué portfolio, please visit this link. You’ll see why the Hulbert Financial Digest has ranked the Communiqué in the top five investment newsletters over the past 10 years and get the latest investing ideas, insights and recommendations that can make you money for the next year and beyond.
