The U.S. Aging Crisis: A Threat to Stock Market Prices?
by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Friday, March 9, 2012: Issue #1726

Robert Arnott claims that the U.S. aging crisis is a threat to future stock market prices. But do the numbers add up?

There’s a new scaremonger in town. And his name is Robert D. Arnott, a portfolio manager, asset-manager executive and Chairman of Research Affiliates in Newport Beach, California.

Mr. Arnott has a simple thesis. Over the next 10 years, the ratio of retirees to active workers will balloon. Retirees, of course, must eventually sell their stocks to support themselves. But there will be fewer young investors around to buy them. Ergo, returns on stocks over the next 10 to 20 years will be anemic.

If this sounds simplistic, congratulations. You probably have a brain and at least a modicum of common sense. This type of “stock market analysis” is really no analysis at all. More to the point, it doesn’t work. Just ask failed economic futurist Harry Dent, whom I’ve written about before.

While it’s inevitable that there will be 10 new senior citizens for each new working-age citizen over the next decade, that in itself doesn’t portend paltry equity returns.

For starters, let’s look at what’s happening to the world population as a whole. There are currently seven billion human beings living on the planet. At the current growth rate, that total is likely to hit eight billion within a decade.

Now, if you believe that investors in China, India, Brazil and other countries will have no interest in buying companies like Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG), ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM), or Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO) in the future, no matter how inexpensively they’re priced, I guess you might put some credence in Mr. Arnott’s thesis.

But that’s highly unlikely. Citizens of capitalist countries are getting wealthier and better educated all the time. And the world is becoming more integrated. Would you really have a problem buying shares of Toyota (NYSE: TM), British Petroleum (NYSE: BP) or Nestle (OTC: NSRGY.PK) if they were bargains?

Of course not, regardless of the demographic trends in Japan, Britain, or Switzerland.

Mr. Arnott doesn’t just miss the big picture about the future, however. He also misinterprets the past. In a recent Wall Street Journal interview, for example, he talks about the collapse of Japan’s stock market over the last 23 years and blames it on the country’s aging population.

I have a better explanation. When the Nikkei 225, Japan’s leading stock market benchmark, climbed to nearly 40,000 in 1989, it was a bubble of epic proportions. Many stocks traded at more than 100 times earnings. And real estate was even more absurd. Just the 1.32 square miles that encompassed the Imperial Palace in Tokyo were valued at more than all the real estate in California combined.

Now that’s nuts. Crazier still were the Japanese banks that loaned money against these wildly inflated property values. This led to a protracted banking crisis that Japan’s political class refused to clean up.

To imagine that the two deflationary decades that followed this mania were the result of an aging population is like blaming this year’s warm winter on your aching big toe. Yet Arnott insists we should hunker down since “[Japan’s] demography is 10 years ahead of ours.”

Want to know what will really determine stock prices in the future? Earnings. I challenge you to look back through history and find even one publicly traded company that increased its profits quarter after quarter, year after year, and the stock didn’t tag along.

Perhaps our aging retirees will buy less in the future and contribute less to U.S. corporate profits. But there are billions of consumers around the world hungering for homes, computers, cars, phones, health insurance, credit cards, pharmaceuticals and golf clubs. They’re likely to be an engine of world economic growth – and rising U.S. corporate profits – for decades to come.

Don’t let anyone scare you otherwise.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

At our Oxford Club Chairman’s Circle conference at The Ritz-Carlton in Naples last week, I noted a decided optimism about the outlook for the bond market. This enthusiasm is almost certainly misplaced.

We’re at the tail end of the biggest 30-year rally in bonds the nation has ever seen. Recall that three decades ago, Fed Chairman Paul Volcker pushed the prime rate all the way up to 21.5% to squelch inflation. Long-term Treasury yields reached 16%. But from that pinnacle, long-term yields have plummeted to around 3% today. Bond prices have soared accordingly.

It isn’t just unlikely that today’s bond buyers will see annual double-digit returns going forward, it’s mathematically impossible. And yet I sense that many fixed-income investors don’t understand this.

It’s not unusual to meet an investor who has plunked money in a bond fund because “its long-term track record is excellent.” They don’t seem to realize that it’s also irrelevant. Never has the old saw, “Past returns are no guarantee of future results,” been more apropos.

This doesn’t mean you should avoid bonds altogether, of course. But if you’re going to buy bonds, now more than ever you need to be smart about it. Here’s what you should do:

1. Ladder your maturities. You should buy two-year, five-year and 10-year bonds. If rates go up – as they will eventually – your bond prices will fall, temporarily. But you will get your principal back at maturity and be able to reinvest your principal at higher rates. And paltry as bond yields are today, they still beat the heck out of the 0.05% that the average money market fund is paying.
2. Keep a close eye on expenses. In the world of fixed-income investing, keeping a Scrooge-like eye on expenses is essential. Why? Because it’s difficult to work magic in the button-down world of fixed-income investing. Managers rarely earn their fees. And 12b-1 fees can eat away at your returns like termites in an antebellum house. My advice is to stick with individual bonds, Vanguard funds (whose expenses are one-sixth of the industry average) and low-cost ETFs.
3. Avoid leveraged bond funds. Ever wonder how bond yields can be so low and yet the yield on your closed- or open-end bond fund is higher, even after expenses? Open your eyes. Unless you’re holding junk bonds, your fund manager is using leverage, the fixed-income equivalent of buying stocks on margin. By borrowing cheap, he or she is leveraging the portfolio to add yield. This works just fine while bond prices are flat or rising. But when bond prices fall – as they will when interest rates rise – these shareholders will take a shellacking. Consider yourself forewarned.

Some fixed-income investors tell me they feel safe for now since Bernanke has pledged to keep interest rates low through 2014. Think again. The Fed has only announced its intention to keep rates low. (Future economic conditions could quickly change that.) The Fed is also keeping long-term bond yields artificially low by buying these instruments to goose the economy.

Inflation could tick up. The Fed could raise rates and/or quit buying long-term Treasuries. In the end, the Federal Reserve sets short-term interest rates, but not bond yields and prices.

Know this. Understand it. And act accordingly. Bond investors today should be in a defensive posture, capturing higher yields than what’s available in cash instruments, but prepared for that point in the future when bond yields will rise and prices will fall.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

At a conference here at The Ritz-Carlton in Naples, Florida, I heard an increasingly common question. An attendee asked me how anyone could feel good about investing in stocks with economic and political prospects so bleak.

I reminded him that men and women have been saying that the world is going to hell in a hand basket for, oh, the last 5,000 years or so. (As the old proverb says, the dogs bark but the caravan moves on.) It’s important to remember that so much pessimism exists today because the national media delivers a terribly skewed view of the world we live in.

As I have written in this column before, there are plenty of reasons to be bullish on equities, including low inflation, zero interest rates, rapidly developing overseas markets, cheap valuations and all-time record corporate profits.

But that’s just in the short term. There are even better reasons to be bullish longer term. Understanding this will make you a better investor.

Consider, for example, Matt Ridley’s book The Rational Optimist. Ridley, a scientist, journalist and professor at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York, points out that the world is actually improving dramatically and the pace is quickening, thanks to rising personal and economic freedom and evolving technologies, medicine and trade practices. Yes, the world is far from perfect, but it is getting better.

Peter Diamandis and Steven Kotler strike a similar note in their new book Abundance: Why the Future Will Be Much Better Than You Think. In an adaptation published in the February 13 issue of Forbes, they point out that the trend isn’t nearly as dire as many seem to believe. Quite the opposite, in fact:

“During the past century child mortality decreased by 90% while the average human life span increased by 100%. Food is cheaper and more plentiful than ever (groceries cost 13 times less today than in 1870). Poverty has declined more in the past 50 years than the previous 500. In fact, adjusted for inflation, incomes have tripled in the past 50 years. Even Americans living under the poverty line today have access to a telephone, toilet, television, running water, air-conditioning, and a car. Go back 150 years and the richest robber barons could have never dreamed of such wealth.

“Nor are these changes restricted to the developed world. In Africa today a Masai warrior on a cellphone has better mobile communications than the President of the United States did 25 years ago; if he’s on a smart phone with Google, he has access to more information than the President did just 15 years ago, with a feast of standard features: watch, stereo, camera, video camera, voice recorder, GPS tracker, video teleconferencing equipment, a vast library of books, films, games, music. Just 20 years ago these same goods and services would have cost over $1 million …

“Right now all information-based technologies are on exponential growth curves: They’re doubling in power for the same price every 12 to 24 months. This is why an $8 million supercomputer from two decades ago now sits in your pocket and costs less than $200. This same rate of change is also showing up in networks, sensors, cloud computing, 3-D printing, genetics, artificial intelligence, robotics and dozens more industries.”

Investors everywhere should familiarize themselves with these points of view. After all, you’ve heard the doomsayers (again and again). You owe it to yourself to hear the other side of the story.

Looking at broad trends and exciting new developments provides a powerful antidote to the fear generated by relentless media negativity. Plus, it gives you the knowledge and confidence necessary to capitalize on the hundreds of great investment opportunities that exist in today’s fast-moving financial markets.

The world truly is your oyster … but only if you have the optimism to see it that way.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

More than two thousand years ago, the Greek sage and philosopher Epictetus counseled, “It is impossible for anyone to begin to learn what he thinks he already knows.”

Nowhere is this truer than in the stock market. You need only ask the many thousands of investors who have sat out an historic rally – the market has doubled from its lows years ago – because they just knew stock prices were only going to go lower.

That mindset has proved to be an expensive one. Yet these individuals now face another test.

If they jump into stocks today, having already missed one enormous move, they risk being in for the next leg down. That would hurt. On the other hand, if they continue to sit on the sidelines – earning next to nothing in bonds or cash – the market may well power higher and leave them with an even more extreme choice in the weeks and months ahead.

What is the prudent investor to do?

They Rise and They Fall

The first is to understand the error of your ways. Every market timer believes that if he sits patiently on the sidelines, he will get a better opportunity to buy stocks at lower prices.

And they often do. Unfortunately, they generally get to feeling so good about missing the downdraft that they convince themselves that the market will keep falling.

And, again, if often does. Until, of course, it doesn’t.

As the market climbs, they begin to rationalize that this is just “a bear market rally” or “a dead-cat bounce.” Until it becomes obvious that the train left the station and they’re still standing on the platform.

Cash is Not King, but Stocks Might Be

Warren Buffett’s mentor Benjamin Graham once said that no investor should have more than 75% of his money in stocks or less than 25%.

That’s a good rule of thumb. Seventy-five percent keeps you from getting overly enthused when times are good. And twenty-five percent keeps you from throwing in the towel when times are bad.

But what do you do now if you’re one of those who has played it too cautious until now and are fed up with your negative real returns in Treasury bonds or cash?

First, stop justifying what you’ve done and get off the dime. Start committing money to high-quality stocks in a gradual way. After all, if you shift a big percentage of your portfolio into stocks right now, you could regret it. And if you remain in cash, you could regret that, too.

So hedge yourself. Start moving money into stocks at regular intervals, being sure to keep buying if the market dips so you get better entry prices.

An Easy Way to Start Investing

A conservative place to start would be the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSE: VYM). True, it currently yields just 2.9%, but that’s still 50% more than 10-year Treasuries are paying and 50 times as much as the average money market fund.

Even if stocks go nowhere over the next 10 years – highly unlikely given the decade we just had – you’d still be better off in this fund than in a bond or money market fund.

There are a ton of reasons to put off making this move from the state of the economy to the size of the deficit. But that’s just the kind of thinking that got you stuck on the sidelines.

Look at the bright side. Inflation and interest rates are low. We’ve had five straight months of declines in the jobless rate. The ECB has extended three-year, low-cost loans to European banks. The Greek parliament has voted to actually cut spending. And we’re in a period of all-time record corporate profits.

So cast off. As the great nineteenth-century theologian William Shedd pointed out, “A ship in harbor is safe, but that is not what ships are built for.”

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

Last week I spoke at an investment conference at Rancho Santana, a charming resort community on the Pacific coast of Nicaragua, near the town of San Juan del Sur.

Set on more than two miles of coastline with rolling hills and dramatic cliffs, the reserve attracts expats, investors, surfers and nature lovers from all over the world. They like the idea of owning a piece of – or at least visiting – one of the most spectacular stretches of coastal land in the world.

Some are attracted because the property is so inexpensive. It’s hard to believe you can buy a stunning home site directly on the Pacific Ocean for less than $175,000.

And it’s not just the property that’s inexpensive. One evening 14 of us rode into town to have dinner at a favorite local restaurant, Yolanda’s. The proprietor served up heaping helpings of local lobster, fresh vegetables, black beans and rice, plantains and plenty of Corona beer. When I picked up the tab, I was shocked. The cost was less than $9 a person.

Some investors here are banking on increased foreign investment and commercial development. The International Monetary Fund estimates that Nicaragua’s economic growth hit 4% last year… and is on the verge of accelerating.

Exports jumped 23% last year. Tourism is up. MSN Money ranked Nicaragua at the top of their list of “Ten Exotic Retirement Spots for 2011,” telling readers “[Now] is the time to put this country at the top of your super-cheap overseas retirement list.” CNN Money calls it “the next Costa Rica.” Indeed, Rancho Santana is just 50 miles north of the Costa Rican border.

Good things are happening locally, too. A local business leader plans to invest $300 million next door in a world-class marina, golf and spa resort called Guacalito. Due to open in Spring 2013, it’s located just 30 minutes from Rancho Santana and is already bringing increased investment and improved infrastructure to the region. And an international airport is planned for the Tola area, located less than a half hour away.

Other investors are putting money to work here for privacy reasons. They want to diversify their portfolios beyond the prying hands of angry ex-spouses or potential litigants.

But for most, it’s the sheer beauty of the place. The New York Times points out that, “The beaches are among the finest in the Americas, and among the least developed.” Gaze out from atop one of the many bluffs on this 2,700-acre reserve and you’ll see what the coast of California looked like a hundred years ago, pristine and largely undeveloped.

Residential lots are selling quickly. Over 50 homes have been built and 24 more are under construction. It’s not hard to see why. The terrain is such that home sites can capture views of the ocean, the nearby valley and lovely sunsets. Labor costs are significantly lower here. And a master association and various sub-associations exist so that owners are assured that high and consistent standards of quality are maintained.

Is oceanfront property in Nicaragua the ultimate alternative investment? That’s for you to decide. But if you’d like to learn more, feel free to visit the website or, better yet, sign up for a property tour.

The cost is $500 per person ($600 per couple) and includes all transportation, breakfast and three nights in oceanfront accommodations at Rancho Santana. This is a great trip for those wanting to come down and investigate investment, second home or retirement opportunities. (Contact Bryan McMandon.)

In the interest of full disclosure, Rancho Santana is being developed, in part, by colleagues of mine at Agora Publishing. However, I am not compensated in any way (directly or indirectly) for any sales at the development. I just think it’s a beautiful place and an interesting investment.

And whether you decide to invest or not, I know you’d enjoy the experience.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, December 12, 2011: Issue #1662

I’ve been a table-pounding bear on the euro for almost two years now. With each passing day, that currency looks more and more like a failed government experiment.

Painful, structural changes are needed – and the profligate Greeks need to be booted out. And, even then, the euro is likely to continue its decline against other major currencies.

But the euro, perhaps in altered form, will survive. So don’t believe the doomsters who say we’re headed for another world financial calamity like we faced in 2008.

Too many investors are nervously sitting on the sidelines, missing great opportunities in today’s market. If you understand how the euro crisis is a good thing, you can start making serious money again. Here’s why…

Aside from being Chief Investment Strategist for Investment U, I also oversee the investment decisions of The Oxford Club – an exclusive community of like-minded investors. As I write, we currently have 21 open positions in our Oxford Trading Portfolio. Our average gain on open positions is 36 percent, even though our average holding period is 197 days.

During this volatile year, we also stopped out of 17 other positions. Five of these were sold at a loss. The other 12 were profitable. Our average total return on these 17 trades was 21 percent. (By comparison, the S&P 500 is up two percent for the year.)

One of the reasons we’ve prospered is that we ignored all the macro-economic squawking from week to week and focused instead on finding great businesses selling at compelling prices.

“That all sounds well and good,” an investor told me the other day. “But what are you going to do when the Eurozone collapses?”

Despite all the gloomy forecasts, that won’t happen.

One of the main reasons is Germany. Officials and citizens there aren’t panicking about the problems in the Eurozone because, in some important ways, they see it as an opportunity.

Yes, problems there are serious. Greece is a complete basket case. Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland have too much debt, too. But their problems are more manageable.

Germany knows this – and understands what’s at stake in the Eurozone. Germany is a world-class exporter. Yet because it shares a currency with weaker nations, its currency is cheaper and so, too, are its exports. The currency union has been like rocket fuel for Germany’s exports.

However, Germany doesn’t want to be put on the hook for bailing out smaller, spendthrift nations. And the country is particularly sensitive to criticism that it’s attempting to dominate Europe politically or economically.

So Germany is hanging back, treating the crisis much as the Republicans treated the debt-ceiling impasse earlier this year. The Germans see this as an opportunity to secure important policy concessions rather than an emergency to be solved at all costs.

Who can blame them? German unemployment is seven percent and falling. Deficits there are coming down. Germans don’t want to dictate to other union members. They want them to take responsibility and make serious reforms to their unemployment insurance system, their healthcare sector and other pieces of the welfare state.

Politically, these measures will be tough to swallow. That’s why we seen so much leadership turnover in Europe lately. But the time for half-measures is over. Even Sarkozy had told French citizens the uncomfortable truth: The state is simply unable to provide existing generous benefits much longer.

Once Europeans understand this in their bones, the necessary reforms can be made. And then, who knows, Americans may get serious about entitlement reform, too.

So don’t expect a financial catastrophe in Europe. These problems are serious and will take time to work out. But the currency crisis is a much-needed catalyst for important changes.

Recognize that and you can return to world equity markets with confidence – and start meeting your investment goals again.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Thursday, November 24, 2011: Issue #1650

In December 1996, I sold some shares of Best Buy (NYSE: BBY) to offset gains elsewhere in my portfolio.

I still consider it the most boneheaded investment move I ever made. A year later, the stock was up more than five-fold. A few years further on, it was up more than thirty-fold.

The worst part is that I didn’t dislike the business prospects for Best Buy at the time. Quite the contrary, in fact. I sold it only because I had substantial capital gains and was cleaning out my portfolio to offset them.

I don’t always do that any more. And you shouldn’t necessarily, either. Despite what your tax advisor may tell you, you should never sell an investment for tax reasons alone. Nor do you have to.

Here’s why…

The IRS allows you to offset realized gains with realized losses each calendar year. If you do, however, you must wait at least 30 days before buying the same shares back. (Otherwise you run afoul of the wash-sale rule.)

Offsetting gains at the end of the year is often a sensible move. Most stocks aren’t appreciably higher 30 days later. And if you still like them, you can buy them back then.

There is a risk, however, and it’s called the January effect. The first month of the year is traditionally a strong one for the market. A lot of pension and IRA money gets invested early each year. Plus, there’s often a rebound from the tax-loss selling that goes on each December.

If a stock you own soars in January, there’s a natural reluctance to buy it back. The temptation is to wait until it comes back down. But what if it doesn’t? You’ve taken a limited loss but sold an investment with unlimited upside potential.

There’s a way around this problem, however. And you can take advantage of it – but only if you’re willing to move this week.

In late November each year, I look at my entire portfolio for any companies that are trading below my entry price but NOT near my trailing stops. If I still like a stock, I often make the decision to double down on it for 30 days.

Why? Because I can sell the original shares at the end of December for a tax loss. And if the stock rallies in January, it’s not a problem. After all, thanks to my purchase in November, I own the same number of shares as I bought originally.

What if you don’t have the cash to double down on your position? Use margin. Again, I’m recommending this only for a 30-day period. Your margin interest charge will be minimal.

The risk, of course, is that your shares will be worth less in late December and you will have a paper loss on the second purchase.

However, just the opposite may happen. Remember, the January effect is often preceded by the Santa Claus rally, the tendency of the stock market to do well in the second half of December. As a result, you could end up with a smaller loss in your original shares and a paper gain on your second purchase.

(The Santa Claus rally is never certain, of course, and another reason why you should only add to those companies whose earnings prospects remain strong.)

Bear in mind, when selling for tax purposes, the IRS requires that you buy those identical shares AT LEAST 30 days before you sell the others. So if you want to use this strategy for 2011, you must act this week.

If we have the traditional mid-December to early February rally, you’ll thank me. And then perhaps again on April 15.

Good investing,

Alexander Green

by Alexander Green, Investment U’s Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, April 25, 2011: Issue #1498

“Buy Japan now?” a friend asked recently. “Are you nuts?”

His sentiment is understandable. Aside from the unfathomable human suffering in Japan over the past several weeks, there have been enormous economic setbacks as well.

Sendai, the biggest port in northeast Japan and a major exporter of auto parts, machinery and marine products, was virtually wiped off the map. Half a dozen oil refineries in the same area, representing a third of the nation’s entire refining capacity, are shut down. Roads, bridges, railways and other major infrastructure have been destroyed. And the Japanese economy – already limping along for most of the past two decades – is also beset with the world’s highest public debt relative to GDP (225%) and a rapidly aging population.

Why would anyone want to invest here?

In my experience, those words accompany virtually every great buying situation. But it takes more than just a lack of interest to create a true contrarian opportunity. Both sentiment and valuations have to be at an extreme.

And that’s certainly the case here…

Japanese Stock Prices Are Less Than Book Value

The average Japanese stock is selling for less than 14 times its annual profit. That’s cheap, and Japanese accounting methods also tend to understate earnings. An even better indicator is found in book values (assets minus liabilities). Stocks around the world (including the United States, Europe and China) currently sell for approximately two times book value. In Japan, they sell for less than book value. By this measure, U.S. stocks are twice as expensive as Japanese stocks.

What will turn Japan’s market around? For starters, the enormous rebuilding that will be required over the next few years. Devastated areas account for seven percent of Japan’s economy and a substantial portion of its land mass. A lot of businesses will receive substantial contracts as a result of the catastrophe.

History shows that Japan is adept at rebounding from catastrophe. (Take World War II or the 1995 Kobe earthquake as examples.) And when Tokyo enters a bull market, it can look like the Silver Spurs Rodeo. For example, if you invested $10,000 in the S&P 500 in 1970, two decades later it would have been worth more than $76,000. Not bad.

But the same amount invested in the Nikkei 225 would have turned into more than $600,000.

How to Buy into Japan’s Advanced Economic Power

Although China’s economy has now eclipsed Japan’s in size, Japan is still Asia’s most advanced economic power, with world-leading technologies and an unmatched infrastructure.

The cost of doing business in Japan has decreased dramatically in recent years, as well. Land prices, office rents and labor costs have come way down. So have taxes and tariffs. And the government has instituted serious banking reforms.

The nation also sits on a mountain of personal financial assets – more than $100,000 for every man, woman and child. After a decade of negative stock market returns, most of this capital is sitting in low-yielding bank deposits. Even a small fraction of these assets returning to the equity market could give it a serious jolt.

So how do you play a rebound? Consider a Japan ETF or some of the country’s unloved blue chips like Toyota (NYSE: TM), Mitsubishi Financial (NYSE: MTU), Canon (NYSE: CAJ), or NTT DOCOMO (NYSE: DCM).

The healing there will take time, of course. But just as the U.S. stock market rebounded from the recent financial crisis quicker than almost anyone expected, things in Japan may look dramatically different in six to 12 months from now.

Of course, very few people believe that. But, in one sense, that’s a good thing. Negative sentiment and low valuations are the defining characteristics of contrarian investing.

Bottom fishermen, cast your nets.

Good investing,

Alexander Green

by Alexander Green, Investment U’s Chief Investment Strategist
Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Six weeks ago, I wrote a column advising short-term speculators to sell their gold.

Since that time, the metal has drifted lower. But the brunt of the decline is likely still ahead.

As I’ve said before, gold is difficult to value under the best of circumstances. It pays no interest, has no earnings, provides no rent. What gold will be worth next week or next month is whatever buyers will pay for it at the time. And that, in technical terms, is a guess.

I’ve heard gold bugs make their case. Some are based on emotion. Others are based on political fantasies about the Federal Reserve turning us into the Weimar Republic circa 1923, or modern-day Zimbabwe.

What I rarely hear them talking about is pedestrian stuff like supply and demand…

When Buyers Become Sellers, Look Out Below

Billions of dollars have been spent building gold mines over the last few years, so it’s not inconceivable that supply could begin to outstrip demand.

Of course, demand itself is fickle.

In 2005, investors made up just 16% of total demand for gold. Today, it’s more than 40%. Gold ETFs have taken in more than $50 billion since 2004.

What will happen to the price of gold when these buyers become net sellers, as many will when it becomes clear that the party is over? Paulson & Co., a hedge fund, now holds more than $4 billion in the SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSE: GLD). I wouldn’t want to be standing in front of his eventual liquidation. And, like most hedge fund managers, Paulson is not a “buy-and-hold” investor.

Some bulls justify buying gold at these levels because it briefly traded at more than $800 an ounce in 1980. And they say if you simply adjust for inflation, gold should be trading at $2,300 today.

That’s weak. Here’s why…

Don’t Be Blinded by the Gold Light

Gold badly underperformed inflation – not to mention stocks, bonds, real estate and burying your money in a hole – for 20 years after 1980. Why is it suddenly destined to catch up now?

Or look at it another way: On August 25, 1999, gold traded at $252.55 an ounce. Adjusting for inflation, gold should be trading at $339.65 an ounce today.

Granted, my starting point is the 30-year-low. But then, a calculation based on the 1980 high is just as arbitrary.

It’s understandable that gold spiked during the 2007-2009 financial crisis. Gold is an excellent barometer of investor anxiety. But that crisis is over. The recession – defined as two straight quarters of negative GDP growth – ended in June 2009. And inflation is running at just 1.2%.

So why is gold still in the stratosphere?

What to Do With Your Gold Holdings Now

Yes, I know the price of food, gasoline, health care and college tuition are all going up much faster than the official inflation rate. But let’s also concede that the price of cars, computers, appliances, electronics, furniture and, not insignificantly, homes – the biggest asset most consumers will ever buy – is coming decidedly down.

Experienced investors know that after an asset has made a huge run, the little guy – forever a day late and a dollar short – starts clamoring for a piece of the action. At that point, the bloom is off the rose. It’s too late to buy and generally high time to sell.

Take my old neighbors, Sam and Brian. They lost their shirts in Internet stocks in 2000-2002. Now they’re stuck with huge negative equity in Florida condos that they bought pre-construction – a “no-brainer” in 2005.

So what are they doing with their rapidly vanishing capital today?

You guessed it. Now that gold is up five-fold in the last 10 years and three-fold in the last five years, they’re convinced that a big move lies just ahead.

Maybe. But what’s certain is that one lies just behind.

My advice? Keep your gold bullion and blue-chip mining stocks that you own as an inflation-hedge or part of your long-term asset allocation.

But if you’re counting on gold to dash higher, note that the last time investors bought into a gold mania it took more than 25 years for them to break even – not counting inflation.

As Mark Twain famously said, “History may not repeat itself. But it rhymes.”

Good investing,

Alexander Green

by Alexander Green, Investment U’s Chief Investment Strategist
Thursday, October 28, 2010: Issue #1376

Six months ago, I made a strong case for buying inflation-adjusted Treasuries, better known as TIPS.

I suggested that Washington’s massive fiscal stimulus, plus record-low interest rates, might ultimately prove inflationary.

So far, they haven’t. But investors clearly feel that inflation – the thief that robs us all – is just around the corner.

Look at the traditional inflation harbinger – gold. The metal has hit one new high after another this year.

TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) have soared, too. In fact, they’ve rallied so far that for the first time ever, five-year TIPS were sold at auction earlier this week with a yield of minus 0.5%.

That’s right… they guarantee a negative yield. Yet investors are gobbling them up anyway.

What’s going on here? Let’s start at the beginning…

The Inside Track on TIPS

Here are some Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) characteristics…

• They pay interest every six months, just like a regular Treasury bond.
• Unlike traditional bonds, your principal increases each year by the amount of inflation, as measured by the consumer price index (CPI). The semi-annual interest payments also increase by the amount of inflation.
• The interest you receive is exempt from state and local income taxes (but not federal).
• TIPS are less volatile than traditional bonds.
• TIPS are excellent diversifiers.

But can TIPS possibly be worth holding, even when they sport a negative yield?

Perhaps for long-term investors (as I’ll explain in a moment). But not for short-term traders. Here’s why…

Think Twice Before Buying TIPS for the Short-Term

Current yields of less than zero on TIPS are due to rock-bottom Treasury rates and fears of higher inflation just over the horizon.

It’s simple math. Five-year Treasuries are yielding a paltry 1.2%. Given the weak dollar and Washington’s addiction to spending, traders and investors are betting that inflation will run at 1.7% or more.

That makes five-year TIPS just as attractive as five-year bonds, since 1.7% minus the 0.5% negative yield equals 1.2%.

Inflation or Disinflation?

Of course, the financial markets are a bit schizophrenic right now. Inflation protectors like gold and TIPS have rallied. But so have inflation-sensitive investments like investment grade bonds. Investors can’t seem to decide whether we’re in for inflation or disinflation.

And of course, nobody knows for sure. But TIPS have rallied by 10% over the last year, with no uptick in inflation. If the folks betting on disinflation – or its more severe cousin, outright deflation – are right, these bonds could undergo a serious price adjustment, giving investors a haircut in the process.

TIPS investors aren’t just guaranteed negative yields right now. They may also experience a negative total return for several years in a row.

So why shouldn’t long-term investors sell them outright?

How to Tackle TIPS if You’re a Long-Term or Short-Term Investor

Some would be prudent to do just that. The only catch is this: What if the inflation hawks are right?

If they are, TIPS will give a higher future return than traditional fixed-income investments – and with the highest degree of safety. (They are, after all, obligations of the U.S. government.)

True, there are other inflation alternatives. But gold has already quintupled over the last decade. And that other famous inflation hedge – your home – is likely to remain mired in quicksand for years to come, thanks to the overhang of foreclosures and other unsold properties.

The bottom line is this:

• Long-term investors – those with a time horizon of five years or more – should hold onto their TIPS.
• But traders and other investors with a shorter time horizon should probably give them a miss.

History shows that once an asset class turns hot – whether it’s stocks, bonds, gold, real estate or TIPS – it rarely delivers the kind of returns it did when it was heating up.

This time could be different, of course. But that’s how investors always rationalize their investments at the top.

The oldest advice is still the best: Caveat emptor.

Alexander Green